So i am being called a liar.
I am an experienced musician and I know what I hear with my own ears. I know what sounds good and what does not, what is and what is not authentic.
The enemy of art is the absence of limitations.
Music today has no value because it is too easy to create and it is available for listening at the push of a button. Nobody cares about it or works at it or struggles for it except the few.
I'm not calling you a liar.
But keep in mind that "I know what sounds good and what does not" is a subjective judgement, more properly phrased as "I know what sounds good and what does not to me."
Despite your musical expertise, you're in no position to dictate what music others may like and dislike, and what others might enjoy or not.
"Authenticity" is also a subjective judgement, and it is a determining factor for you, but not a rule that should apply to everyone and all types of music. I'm a big fan of "country blues," that is one person playing a guitar and singing with no other accompaniment. That's widely deemed "authentic." I'm also a big fan of B.B. King, and I watched a concert a couple of months ago where he was playing backed by a 12-piece orchestra. For a bluesman, that's aggressively and unforgivable unauthentic. But to dismiss that music for being unauthentic is aggressively silly.
Your assertion "The enemy of art is the absence of limitations" is precisely backward. The enemy of art is the the lack of absence of limitations. Artists thrive most successfully in the absence of limitations.
I don't know why I have to explain myself. My original post was about autotune, right? I don't know how that got lost. But as an experienced musician who learned to play guitar mostly by ear, what I am saying is that I can listen to a recording and tell you, nine times out of ten, if the voice on the recording is the person's natural voice or if it has been pitch-corrected. If it has been auto-tuned, I can tell you in two seconds because it sounds so awful it doesn't even resemble a human voice anymore.
When I speak of authenticity, I am speaking of the authenticity of the human voice, not a philosophical definition of what this or that sort of music is supposed to be.
The authentic human voice is capable of such subtlety. It can express the whole range of emotions. When pitch correction software is used, it may improve the tonal pitch, but it destroys the subtle dimensions of the human voice.
My brother once sent me a recording of his teenage daughter singing a song. It was professionally recorded and produced. I told him point blank, "That's not her. What did they do to her voice? Why did they do it?" I knew she had a good voice. They pitch-corrected her voice because they could, not because they should.
And if you don't have a good voice, and/or you're not able to sing a note, maybe you shouldn't sing.
As for my quote, The enemy of art is the absence of limitations, it comes from Orson Welles. And I agree with it. Oh sure, the music business may thrive on having no limitations. But as far as I'm concerned, some of the best recordings I've ever heard were one man singing with his natural authentic voice, playing one guitar. These recordings were known as country blues. Oh, but of course, we all know you are a big fan.