I am so triggered right now by this murder analogy... maybe it's so that can lock that sick motherfucker up for the remainer of his pathetic sick fucking life!!!
Obviously in your example the woman wants the baby, loves the baby, and it presents no health issues to her. So yes charge him twice, and charge him 10 more the children she might have had. I dont give a damn how many charges they give a murder, get rid of him.
What Msslave said us that majority are pro choice as I am. It is now the majority that have to follow a law they disagree with. It blows my mind that other people and a government can dictate to me what I do or do not do with my own body. What happens when all states ban abortion? How about we make male masturbation illegal since sperm is a living thing. it is a mobile carbon-based lifeform. It is a living organism itself so all these pro life people should start banning male masturbation claiming it's against life.
Im telling you right now, if I had gotten pregnant after David raped me and I was legally forced to carry a spawn utter hatred to term and them birth it, because I could not afford to travel to where it is legal. I would have hung myself.
But no where was it written, that abortion can be banned by a majority of states. Most states from what I read would only limit it to the first trimester. And if any state, the few there are that want to, wants to fully ban it, then the people of that state would ultimately have to vote on it. No one leader of a state can just say "Ban x" without the support of the majority of the state. And still, there would have to be legal abortions on the grounds of rape, incest, or the fetus is not surviving or killing the mother to carry it.
No one is telling anyone what to do with their own body, except what RBG said that Roe should not be the grounds for abortion rights. I could not care if someone wants to abort a child, but the ideas coming from Colorado, where they can abort at full term, meaning the baby is ready for birth are disgusting for me. So people are telling me that is okay? to kill a viable baby, that someone carried to term, and at the last moment, say fuck it? does that not disgust anyone else? Thats where I draw the line. If a woman wants one, in the first month or so, then fine have at it, but not after the first trimester. There is plenty of time in the first trimester to decide whether you want to keep it or not. That is the sentiment of a lot of pro lifers. I do now want to see it outright outlawed, only the extreme of it.
No one is losing anything here. It's just saying as RBG said that there is no constitutional grounds for abortion being a right, written in the constitution. That the 14th amendment would not sustain Roe. It was going to eventually be overturned. People in states can vote for what they want, and that's all this is.
Hell, RBG on the flip side of the coin fought for an air force soldier to be able to keep her baby and serve when they made it so you had to get an abortion to stay in. I didn't hear any backlash from that, from that time. No one was calling out the military as hard as this right now.
2nd edit: Still love you all. Shiela_M, still nothing but the utmost respect for you and your situation. I hate disagreeing with you all, but you all are highly intelligent people, with differing opinions than mine. Sorry for triggering you with my murder analogy, but it just seems too convenient to say a baby in the belly is only counted if the mother carrying it is killed.