A new documentary, The Fall of Minneapolis, is out.
https://mustreadalaska.com/watch-the-fall-of-minneapolis-documentary-with-new-details-surrounding-george-floyds-death/The documentary brings up some interesting points:
1) When George Floyd was held on the ground, Derek Chauvin's knee was on Floyd's clavicle (as per police required procedure), not his neck. Furthermore, among the drugs found in Floyd's blood was fentanyl. An ambulance called to the scene, actually went to an address 8 blocks away, and then took 20 minutes to travel the 8 blocks. Mix all of this with any pre existing condition, plus Floyd being restrained, and you can see why Floyd died.
Proof beyond a reasonable doubt means that the case lacks probable cause to appeal and based on the above, if you say Chauvin is guilty guilty guilty and this case lacks merit to appeal, ask yourself if you were in legal trouble and there was reasonable doubt to appeal and a judge/jury refused your appeal, would you consider this fair?
2) The judge insisted on the trial taking place in Minneapolis as there was massive media coverage on the trial, and thus, the chance of an untainted jury was tiny, given the threat of massive destructive riots if Chauvin was found innocent. This is actually, very much akin to a black man, in the year 1960, in Alabama, facing an all white jury. Yes, there was going a particular verdict found, no matter what happened. Do you think this was fair?
I was a cop and given the circumstances, I would not have handled the situation the way it played out. Floyd was being detained because he allegedly passed a counterfeit bill. Myself, I would have written a ticket to appear and alerted federal authorities as passing a counterfeit bill is a federal function anyway. With that said, there are some suspects that just won't cooperate. You try to explain that this will take five minutes and if they cooperate, they'll quickly be on their way, but no, they want to fight, thus going from paying a small fine to facing multiple felonies.