You might be a white supremacist if ...

[_priapism]

If you say things like "One of our attorneys is a Jew."

[Northwest]

If you say things like "One of our attorneys is a Jew."

LOL.

Hey, come on; at least she didn't say "Jew boy!"

[Sensualtravler]

Then again, perhaps you have a different understanding of the word "proving"...

Exactly; the action of "proving" obviously does not involve getting someone to see something which they are intent to not see. If it did, nothing would ever be proven, nothing could ever be resolved, and victory would always go to the stubborn rather than the most realistic.

Mature minds have an independent viewer function which can be persuaded by a well crafted argument, even when that argument goes against what they want to be true. Lesser minds, when confronted by facts which challenge their biases simply refuse to acknowledge the facts.

Realistically, if you aren't persuadable by another person's argument, they you aren't doing anything other than posturing. Inflexibility doesn't prove that you're right; it proves that you aren't really functioning at a serious level.

That's a type of reverse argument tha's been deemed invalid for logical discussions almost since the birth of logic.And look it up yourself. I have better things to do with my time than attempting to disprove illogical methods of intercourse.

[Sensualtravler]

If you say things like "One of our attorneys is a Jew."

LOL.

Hey, come on; at least she didn't say "Jew boy!"

But, you didn't mind uttering it, and laughed about it,so what's that say for you?

[Athos_131]

Then again, perhaps you have a different understanding of the word "proving"...

Exactly; the action of "proving" obviously does not involve getting someone to see something which they are intent to not see. If it did, nothing would ever be proven, nothing could ever be resolved, and victory would always go to the stubborn rather than the most realistic.

Mature minds have an independent viewer function which can be persuaded by a well crafted argument, even when that argument goes against what they want to be true. Lesser minds, when confronted by facts which challenge their biases simply refuse to acknowledge the facts.

Realistically, if you aren't persuadable by another person's argument, they you aren't doing anything other than posturing. Inflexibility doesn't prove that you're right; it proves that you aren't really functioning at a serious level.

That's a type of reverse argument tha's been deemed invalid for logical discussions almost since the birth of logic.And look it up yourself. I have better things to do with my time than attempting to disprove illogical methods of intercourse.

You'd rather defend racists in this thread?

Got it.

#Resist

[Athos_131]

...you defend racists in this thread.

#Resist

[Northwest]

If you say things like "One of our attorneys is a Jew."

LOL.

Hey, come on; at least she didn't say "Jew boy!"

But, you didn't mind uttering it, and laughed about it,so what's that say for you?

My "laughter" was ironic, and my utterance implied that Moore is, in fact, a bigot -- something which I'm quite certain is true.

The multi-layered way which I'm inclined to communicate is clearly a bit too challenging for you, and I'm not disposed to write down to your level. You should find other people to read my posts and explain them to you.

[Athos_131]

...you oppose net neutrality.

#Resist

[Lois]

Northwest supports net neutrality.  Maybe you should ask him before assuming such things.

[Northwest]

Northwest supports net neutrality.  Maybe you should ask him before assuming such things.

I don't think you read that as Athos intended it to be read, Lois. His comment about net neutrality is meant to be the second half of the quotation which makes up the title of the thread,

The whole thing read all together would read "You might be a white supremacist if...you oppose net neutrality."

[Lois]

Ah, ok.

[Jed_]

If you say things like "One of our attorneys is a Jew."

LOL.

Hey, come on; at least she didn't say "Jew boy!"

But, you didn't mind uttering it, and laughed about it,so what's that say for you?

My "laughter" was ironic, and my utterance implied that Moore is, in fact, a bigot -- something which I'm quite certain is true.

The multi-layered way which I'm inclined to communicate is clearly a bit too challenging for you, and I'm not disposed to write down to your level. You should find other people to read my posts and explain them to you.

I understood your irony, and yes he is a bit obtuse among other things.

[Athos_131]

... you are spouting "America First."

#Resist

[Lois]

You might be a white supremacist if ...

you are always picking fights with black people.

[Lois]

...upon learning that Cheddar man, one of britain's earliest settlers, had dark skin you declare decried the research as a way of “disappearing whites or dispossessing whites of their homelands.”

I wonder what they would say if they learned that light skin and red hair were likely inherited from the Neanderthals?  Would they embrace the Neanderthals and declare brow ridges a sign of superior intelligence?

[Pervertedneighbor]

You tell an entire race of people that, in order to succeed in your society they need your help and, whenever possible, your financial support, in order to survive, thereby creating a  terminally dependent underclass. 

[Lois]

That makes no sense at all.

[Army of One]

I think I understood what PN meant, Lois; he said someone might be a white supremacist if they believe "those people wouldn't survive without our help", despite "those people" having been self-sufficient for many years.

Now for my own:
You might be a white supremacist if...you believe non-white asylum seekers should "go back to where they came from," despite the very real threats if they do so, but want open arms for whites at the slightest rumour of persecution.[cough, cough]Peter Dutton[cough, cough]

(Now I hope I've made myself clear.)

[Pervertedneighbor]

Let me see here...

You might be a white supremacist if...

OK, here goes...

if you get to make the judgment of who is
and who is not a racist
of what people of color deserve your respect
and what people of color do not
and you alone get to decide
what is acceptable
for each and every person to say.
After all, that is the definition
of being lily white
and being supreme to others.
 

[Jed_]

. . . . if you think white privilege doesn’t exist.

. . . . if you think reverse racism is a worse problem than racism.