You might be a white supremacist if ...

[Lois]

... you mobilize the nation to help the victims of hurricanes in Houston and Florida, but blame the American citizens of Puerto Rico for their predicament and do nothing.

[Lois]

Question was not so much about grades, but entire transcript, and whether any of his tuition cost paid by Harvard, was attributed to being foreign born, as he stated in his own biography.

Would have been easier if he had ever published in the Law Review that claims Barry Suetto/Barry be their Editor, but alas, never found anything he published.

Same with the previous college, where no one admits being in his class, or knowing him there at all... no roommates... nada.  just makes folks wonder.

Moot point at this time, after all, so he has outlasted his critics, seems.

I see Athos does not understand the game.  Let me give another example:

You insist that the first black President was not smart enough to attend Harvard, and demand to see his grades.

Gee, so where are Trump's transcripts?  And strangely no one ever remembered seeing him in class ....

As for your claim about Obama, it rates a "Pants on Fire":  http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/feb/14/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-people-who-went-school-obama-nev/

Most telling is that Harvard proudly claims Barack Obama as an alumni, but the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania does not even acknowledge Trump's attendance.

And no, Obama never claimed to be foreign born.  You've been reading Breithate propaganda again. Bad, bad, Joan!

Also I would remind you that being an editor does not make you an author, and yet Barack Obama did submit an article to the Harvard Law Review.  I just checked it out.  Remember: Google is your friend.

[Lois]

... you admonish successful black people saying "instead of criticizing the United States you should be grateful!", but say nothing when successful white people complain about regulations and grumble about paying taxes.

[Lois]

You make every effort to help those struck by hurricanes in Florida and Texas, but complain that Puerto Ricans want every thing done for them and they need to be more self sufficient.

You quickly jump to condemn violence and terrorist acts in the strongest possible terms when they are committed by non-whites, but sound wishy washy when the same acts are committed by whites.

[Lois]

... you believe that the KKK and the NAZIs are less of threat than Antifa and Black Lives Matter.

(Besides, it's not true and the body counts prove it.)

[Lois]

.... you support freedom of speech for white supremacists, but not for black athletes.

[_priapism]

You are on fire tonight Lois!

[Athos_131]

...you repeated claim Trump is not racist, despite being presented many credible, verifiable sources proving otherwise, and refusing to back up your claim.

#Resist

[joan1984]

"Proving" nothing. All opinions, all reactions and attacks, nothing proven at all.

...you repeated claim Trump is not racist, despite being presented many credible, verifiable sources proving otherwise, and refusing to back up your claim.

#Resist

[MissBarbara]

...you repeatedly claim Trump is not racist, despite being presented many credible, verifiable sources proving otherwise, and refusing to back up your claim.

#Resist

"Proving" nothing. All opinions, all reactions and attacks, nothing proven at all.

There's an entire thread devoted to presenting -- without comment or opinion -- verifiable news stories from widely respected sources that demonstrate, to any reasonable person, Athos's point.

Then again, perhaps you have a different understanding of the word "proving"...

[Northwest]

Then again, perhaps you have a different understanding of the word "proving"...

Exactly; the action of "proving" obviously does not involve getting someone to see something which they are intent to not see. If it did, nothing would ever be proven, nothing could ever be resolved, and victory would always go to the stubborn rather than the most realistic.

Mature minds have an independent viewer function which can be persuaded by a well crafted argument, even when that argument goes against what they want to be true. Lesser minds, when confronted by facts which challenge their biases simply refuse to acknowledge the facts.

Realistically, if you aren't persuadable by another person's argument, they you aren't doing anything other than posturing. Inflexibility doesn't prove that you're right; it proves that you aren't really functioning at a serious level.

[joan1984]

Indeed, cataloging and listing in a clearly partisan manner any number of days and actions, while an interesting exercise, makes not a racist of a President.

Even if one believed the various stories, and gave his actions the worst intent, he is not racist in any way, never has been, is/was until recent years a NY Democrat and his family continues to be way to the left of todays President Trump as to his policies and actions.

A list of partisan representations of events does not mean much, not to me and not to the American Voters, seems. While you all try your best to find a way to hang onto failed positions and beliefs, they are still failed positions and failed beliefs.

You expect all to fall into line, as they have been trained during the past 8 years and to condemn whoever Democrats claim to be sexist, racist, whatever "ist" and when it does not happen, your shock is palpable.

Those days are gone. Politicians reliant on those 'trigger' words and such are also soon to be gone, in influence if not totally in numbers in immediate times, and in the not far distance, to be turned over by their own former supporters.

As Barbara noted, the claim, the word, is overused, and scandalously used all to often. Crying wolf causes your claim to fall on deaf ears.

...you repeatedly claim Trump is not racist, despite being presented many credible, verifiable sources proving otherwise, and refusing to back up your claim.

#Resist

"Proving" nothing. All opinions, all reactions and attacks, nothing proven at all.

There's an entire thread devoted to presenting -- without comment or opinion -- verifiable news stories from widely respected sources that demonstrate, to any reasonable person, Athos's point.

Then again, perhaps you have a different understanding of the word "proving"...

[Athos_131]

...you post in yellow font in this thread.

#Resist

#Resist

[Athos_131]

My apologies to the members of the board I respect for the hijack.

claim to be sexist,

Are you now claiming Trump isn't sexist?





30 Times Donald Trump Has Been Completely Insulting to Women

Donald Trump: all the sexist things he said

Donald Trump sexism tracker: Every offensive comment in one place

Crying fake news is not refuting facts, racist.

#Resist

[Athos_131]

#Resist

[Athos_131]

...you like posts in a thread called, "Does anyone know the definition of "slavery"?" but don't have the guts to make an actual post in it.

#Resist

[Athos_131]

...you defend a child rapist.

#Resist

[_priapism]

Your first response to a Detroit undercover police snafu is “Were these all white officers? Mustabeen, no one was shot.”

 

[Athos_131]

...you use #MAGA or any variant of it.

#Resist

[Athos_131]

...you blindly support an Alabama GOP candidate with a history of bigotry and child molestation.