The Trump thread: All things Donald

[Lois]

All I can say to Joan is that some of us love our country.  We find Trump's shameful antics to be so egregious that we cannot take such a lax attitude about them.

And Trump is absolutely not draining any swamps.  He is enabling the worst of the swamp dwellers.

[Athos_131]

#Resist

[Athos_131]

Billy Bush: Yes, Donald Trump, You Said That

#Resist

[Jed_]

I was just reading yet again about his diet.  His 4 food groups appear to McDonald’s, KFC, Oreos and chips.  No person of any age can eat like that and stay healthy let alone one of his advanced age.  There’s just so much access to excellent healthcare can do.

If I were him, I’d worry a lot less about any Russia investigation and a lot more about my cardiovascular system.

[Northwest]

Right.

I don't think the man has the health or stamina to make it through two terms. I know I don't have the stamina for him making it through two terms.

Eat up, Donnie.

[Athos_131]

 "  Russia,  Russia , Russia  "

What we already know about Trump and Russia is bad enough

In July 2016, Trump issued a public plea: “I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.” He was referring to deleted material from the private email server Hillary Clinton used when she was secretary of state. Previously, according to U.S. intelligence officials, state-sponsored Russian hackers had obtained thousands of private emails from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, and the material was being released in a manner clearly intended to damage the Clinton campaign.

We now know that in June 2016, three of the most important figures in the Trump campaign — Trump’s son Donald Trump Jr.; his son-in-law, Jared Kushner; and his campaign chairman, Paul Manafort — had eagerly met with a Kremlin-tied lawyer who promised to share damaging information the Russian government had on Clinton. We also know that in April, another go-between had promised Trump foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos “thousands of emails” containing “dirt” on Clinton.

Did anyone report these shady approaches to the FBI? No.

We know that in the last days of the campaign, Russian cyberwarriors targeted the social media accounts of potential Trump voters in key states. We don’t yet know how they aimed their propaganda so accurately.

We have learned, however, that after the election, the Trump transition team actively undermined sanctions that President Barack Obama had imposed on Russia for its election interference. Flynn discussed relaxing the sanctions with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak — then lied about it to the FBI. Transition adviser K.T. McFarland wrote in an email that the sanctions would make it harder for Trump to improve relations with Russia, “which has just thrown the U.S.A. election to him.” The White House says McFarland meant only that Democrats would claim Russia had thrown the election to Trump.

And we know that members of the Trump campaign’s inner circle consistently failed to disclose their meetings with Russian officials and emissaries. There is a pattern of behavior here. It may or may not be illegal, but it is certainly shocking and unacceptable.

As for obstruction of justice, Trump tweeted Saturday that “I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI.” This indicates the president knew Flynn had committed a crime before meeting with FBI director James B. Comey and, according to Comey, instructing him to drop the Flynn investigation. Trump later fired Comey, telling NBC’s Lester Holt that the reason was the Russia probe. Trump has reportedly hectored other administration officials and members of Congress to stop investigating the Russia connection.

#Resist

[joan1984]

  Actually, while you may dislike some of President Elect Trump's statements, you actually KNOW very very little about any illegal comments or activities of the President Elect... and less about any illegal statements of actions of the President during his transition, or after his Inauguration.

  Look perhaps as some things you may or should know, such as SCOTUS who voted overwhelmingly to allow the exclusion of people from migrating here, if they come from certain Terror Prone nations.  We of course knew this would pass then the 4th Circuit and 9th Circuit showed their overt bias, and they have been overruled, as to stopping such actions, even as the case proceeds.

  Look at the restoration of Land in Utah, which was taken unlawfully by the Obama Administration. More to follow along those lines of sensible actions from this Administration.

  The clamor about what charges may or could or should or might be brought against our President by SC is coming from leaks and speculation by Democrat activists and legislators, without grounds, especially the most recent claims.
The President is the top law enforcement official in the nation, and his opinions are allowed, sought or not sought, private or public.

[Athos_131]

  Actually, while you may dislike some of President Elect Trump's statements, you actually KNOW very very little about any illegal comments or activities of the President Elect... and less about any illegal statements of actions of the President during his transition, or after his Inauguration.

You have proof of this, child rape supporter?

Are you once again tossing a word salad to deflect all this yet again?

You're pathetic.

#Resist

[Athos_131]

Trump may face a reckoning in case brought by female accuser

In the weeks leading up to his election, Donald Trump went on a tear against a list of women who had accused him of touching them inappropriately. One was Summer Zervos, who had been a contestant on his reality television show.

“False stories. All made up. Lies. Lies. No witnesses. No nothing. All big lies,” Trump declared at a rally after the Californian made a statement alleging that Trump kissed and groped her in a 2007 encounter at the Beverly Hills Hotel.

“Total fabrication,” he told a cheering crowd in Gettysburg, Pa. “The events never happened. Never. All of these liars will be sued after the election is over.”

As the nation wrestles with a historic shift in how to address old charges of sexual misbehavior, allegations against Trump, which date to his days as a New York developer, have become part of the public debate. Trump has repeatedly said the accusations against him are groundless. But by turning personal and branding the women liars, Trump has perhaps unwittingly played into a cutting-edge strategy in the legal pursuit of sexual misconduct — claims of defamation such as those used against comedian Bill Cosby and in a lesser-known New York case, argued by two lawyers who are now representing Zervos.

The defamation suit filed in January in New York State Supreme Court by Zervos, a short-lived contestant on “The Apprentice,” has reached a critical point, with oral arguments over Trump’s motion to dismiss scheduled for Tuesday, after which the judge is expected to rule on whether the case may move forward.

If it proceeds, Zervos’s attorneys could gather and make public incidents from Trump’s past and Trump could be called to testify, with the unwelcome specter of a former president looming over him: It was Bill Clinton’s misleading sworn testimony — not the repeated allegations of sexual harassment against him — that eventually led to his impeachment.

“It’s almost a train you can’t stop going down the tracks,” said Joseph Cammarata, who represented Paula Jones against Clinton and, more recently, represented seven Cosby accusers in a defamation suit. “It opens him up to have to answer questions about sexual relations, other relationships, what might have been said, to open up your whole life.”

The use of defamation to litigate an underlying allegation of sexual misconduct addresses other challenges: Often, the statute of limitations is up before accusations come to light; in some instances, the he-said-she-said nature of the testimony makes accusations hard to prove.

“An allegation of defamation against somebody who can seem flamboyantly reckless with the truth may have a higher probability of sticking,” said Naomi Mezey, a law professor at Georgetown University. “Some women feel equally injured and sometimes more outraged by being publicly attacked and called liars for doing what they feel was very brave and in some respects a public service.”

Zervos came forward after The Washington Post’s publication in October 2016 of an “Access Hollywood” video with audio of Trump bragging about grabbing women’s genitals. She issued a statement Oct. 14 alleging that Trump kissed her when she visited him at Trump Tower in December 2007 and that he kissed her, groped her breast and “began thrusting his genitals” when he invited her to join him for dinner later that month in a bungalow at the Beverly Hills Hotel.

The allegations surprised people in Zervos’s home town of Huntington Beach, Calif., where she attracted attention when she was chosen in a national search for Season 5 of “The Apprentice.” But Trump fired her abruptly at the end of the first episode. After filming finished, Zervos returned to work at Sunny’s, her family’s diner. Several of her acquaintances recalled in recent interviews their shock at seeing Zervos appear on television to make allegations about Trump.

“We couldn’t believe it,” said Kathy May, a Trump supporter who recalled conversations at the time.

Zervos is represented by Gloria Allred and her New York based co-counsel, Mariann Meier Wang, who declined to make Zervos available for questions. Allred says she represents Zervos pro bono on her website, where she appeals for donations to pay Zervos’s other legal expenses and says excess contributions will go to rape crisis centers.

Allred and Wang have demonstrated their determination to prove the allegations. They subpoenaed the Trump campaign in March for documents concerning Zervos and “any woman who asserted that Donald J. Trump touched her inappropriately.” The lawyers agreed to suspend the document release until after the New York judge rules.

Allred declined in an interview to discuss her evidence-gathering strategy but said, “We’re not going to be limited to that which we have itemized in our subpoena.” In news conferences, she has been asked whether targets could include outtakes from “The Apprentice,” which might show how Trump treated female contestants such as Zervos.

If the suit goes to trial, Allred, who appeared at news conferences last year alongside three other Trump accusers, could bring other women to the stand.

“My read of the case is that it is designed to force the president to make public material that he would prefer to keep private,” said David Marcus, a law professor at the University of Arizona.

By filing in New York, Allred and Wang have chosen a state where Zervos’s claims may be met with sympathy, said Robert Rabin, a Stanford University law professor. A New York jury is likely to be “anti-Trump, anti-sexual-misconduct and [have] generally liberal norms,” he said.

Allred and Wang settled a defamation case there in 2015. In that suit, two clients accused a Syracuse University basketball coach of defaming them after they spoke up about sexual abuse that they said occurred when they were ball boys for the team.

“We think that that is an important precedent on what the issue of defamation is in New York,” Allred said in a recent interview.

Marc Kasowitz, Trump’s personal attorney, said in a statement that Zervos’s case has “no merit,” describing it as “politically motivated” and “based on allegations of events that never occurred.” Paul Burgo, a lawyer in Kasowitz’s firm, wrote in a recent email that they had no further comment and are seeking “dismissal and alternatively a stay on Constitutional grounds.”

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the administration also had nothing to add about the case. Responding to a reporter’s question at a news briefing in late October, Sanders affirmed that the official White House position is that the women are lying.

That has been Trump’s stance from the beginning. After Zervos made her allegations, Trump posted a statement on his campaign website: “To be clear, I never met her at a hotel or greeted her inappropriately a decade ago.” He decried what he called “made up events,” “100% fabricated and made-up charges,” saying in the last presidential debate that the women were put forward by the campaign of Hillary Clinton, his Democratic rival, or motivated by the desire for “ten minutes of fame,” according to Zervos’s complaint.

In a November statement, Zervos described repercussions after Trump accused her of untruthfulness. “After he called me a liar I was threatened, bullied and saw my business targeted,” she said, asking for a retraction of his statements about her and other women.

Two months later, she filed suit.

Her attorneys’ strategy has challenges, which have prompted an almost year-long battle with Trump’s lawyers. Legal scholars are debating everything from broad constitutional questions of presidential immunity to the finer points of New York law and whether Zervos could appeal should the judge defer the suit until Trump leaves office.

“Of all the many logic puzzles this case presents, the possibility of a deferral ventures into uncharted waters and would likely send the attorneys to the mat,” said J. Maria Glover, a Georgetown University associate law professor who specializes in complex litigation.

Trump’s attorneys argue that the president is immune and that the comments he made were political opinion and therefore “squarely protected by the First Amendment.”

In 1997, a Supreme Court ruling made it possible for a sitting president to be sued for private actions that occurred before he took office. Trump’s attorneys are arguing that Clinton v. Jones, which applies to federal litigation, does not apply in state courts.

“That is where [Trump’s attorneys] are putting their linchpin,” said John L. Diamond, a law professor at the University of California Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco.

Trump’s unusual status, as a candidate and then a sitting president, is not the only complicating factor. Zervos may also face special scrutiny as a former contestant on Trump’s show.

The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff. To show Trump defamed her, she must first demonstrate that her allegations against him were accurate.

If she is deemed a private citizen, Zervos simply would have to show that Trump was negligent toward the truth. If she is a public figure, the bar is far higher.

“She would have to prove he knew [what he said] was false or had reckless disregard for the truth,” said Lee Levine, senior counsel at the law firm Ballard Spahr.

Some experts suggest that the suit could surface one of the mysteries of the 2016 campaign — unused footage from “The Apprentice.”

Trump starred on the show for more than a decade, and multiple cameras captured scenes that never appeared on television. The boardroom drama, which lasted a few minutes on the show, could take 1½ hours to shoot, with Trump playing contestants against one another.

Speculation about the outtakes soared after the “Access Hollywood” video was reported. Bill Pruitt, who worked on “The Apprentice,” tweeted, “As a producer on seasons 1 & 2 of #theApprentice I assure you: when it comes to the #trumptapes there are far worse.”

But Scott Salyers, the show’s supervising casting producer, said in an interview, “I think those outtakes would no longer even put a blip on the radar.”

Salyers spent time with Trump during contestant selections. “He is who he is,” Salyers said — outspoken, prone to off-the-cuff outbursts, an ideal reality-TV star.

Those same traits could become liabilities for Trump, should he take the stand.

“I am not suggesting [Trump] will lie under oath,” Allred said in an interview. But, she added, if the president were to lie, perjury is considered a high crime and misdemeanor and could prompt impeachment hearings.

The stakes for the president go beyond sexual misconduct or defamation: If the judge decides the case cannot proceed, the ruling could stymie attempts to bring other civil suits against Trump in state courts. If, on the other hand, the suit does proceed, it could encourage more litigation against a president who entered office with an unusual array of lawsuits in his wake.

And if Zervos wins, her victory could embolden other accusers.

“There are 10 or 11 other women waiting in the wings,” Rabin said.

#Resist

[Katiebee]

  Actually, while you may dislike some of President Elect Trump's statements, you actually KNOW very very little about any illegal comments or activities of the President Elect... and less about any illegal statements of actions of the President during his transition, or after his Inauguration.

  Look perhaps as some things you may or should know, such as SCOTUS who voted overwhelmingly to allow the exclusion of people from migrating here, if they come from certain Terror Prone nations.  We of course knew this would pass then the 4th Circuit and 9th Circuit showed their overt bias, and they have been overruled, as to stopping such actions, even as the case proceeds.

  Look at the restoration of Land in Utah, which was taken unlawfully by the Obama Administration. More to follow along those lines of sensible actions from this Administration.

  The clamor about what charges may or could or should or might be brought against our President by SC is coming from leaks and speculation by Democrat activists and legislators, without grounds, especially the most recent claims.
The President is the top law enforcement official in the nation, and his opinions are allowed, sought or not sought, private or public.

Any time that a president is this close to impeachment, for causes that are this heinous it is a disgrace. That a President should even be SUSPECTED of colluding with a hostile state speaks volumes about the depths of degraded ethics and values that he has. In other words, whether Trump is innocent or guilty, the fact that he took us to this point indicates he should NOT be POTUS.

He should not hold ANY office of trust and responsibility.

[Athos_131]

Column: Trump endorses Moore — something for Gross America to contemplate

The latest development in Gross America can be summed up in a rather simple headline: “President Trump offers direct endorsement of Senate candidate Roy Moore.”

That’s plenty, I suppose, because in Gross America we only read the headlines. No need for additional information. In fact, if you’ve read this far into the column I’ll assume you’re not a citizen of Gross America — probably some kind of foreign agent or non-gross interloper. Be gone!

Well, if you insist on sticking around, I’ll add some additional, probably not-at-all-important, details.

On Monday morning, President Donald Trump sent out a tweet that read, in part, “we need Republican Roy Moore to win in Alabama. We need his vote on stopping crime, illegal immigration, Border Wall, Military, Pro Life, V.A., Judges 2nd Amendment and more.”

OK, let’s expand that original headline: “President who doesn’t understand proper capitalization or comma use cites legislative goals as reason to vote for Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore.”

That might be a bit too much for Gross America, but honestly, the headline still lacks the details non-gross interlopers like yourself might find relevant.

Let’s try this: “President Trump offers direct endorsement of Alabama Republican Roy Moore, a U.S. Senate candidate facing credible accusations of unwanted sexual advances on teen girls.”

Slightly more informative, considerably more gross, but still too short.

Maybe this: “Republican president accused of sexual misconduct by at least a dozen women offers direct endorsement of Republican Senate candidate from Alabama accused of sexual misconduct by several women when they were teenagers and he was in his 30s.”

That might take up a bit too much space for a headline, but that’s not a big concern. It’ll be in bold, and it’s all most residents of Gross America will pay attention to anyway.

So let’s keep going: “Republican president who said he grabs women by their private parts and used to stroll into beauty pageant dressing rooms while young contestants were naked offers direct endorsement of Republican Senate candidate from Alabama accused of taking a 14-year-old girl to his house, removing her shirt and pants and touching her over her bra and underwear.”

Or this: “Republican president who denied repeated accusations of sexual misconduct and said he would sue his accusers but never did says Alabama man once banned from a shopping mall for repeatedly flirting with teen girls should be elected to U.S. Senate because he will vote against Democrats.”

This takes a slightly different but no-less-accurate tack: “Law-and-order president who spent weekend denouncing nation’s top law-enforcement agency endorses Republican Senate candidate from Alabama who is accused of repeated sexual misconduct with minors and was twice removed from Alabama Supreme Court for refusing to enforce federal law.”

Also: “President who launched anti-Muslim birther conspiracy against Obama offers full-throated endorsement of Alabama Senate candidate who supported birther conspiracy, said homosexuality should be illegal and claimed Sept. 11 terror attacks were God’s way of punishing America for immoral behavior.”

OK, since you’re still here — and I truly admire the distance you’ve come from this column’s headline; it’s quite impressive — let’s weave it all together into the perfect, comprehensive, unassailable headline that even residents of Gross America should be able to consume without getting distracted. Deep breath, everyone:

“Racist-conspiracy-theory-hurling alleged-Christian president incapable of proper capitalization and accused of sexual misconduct by at least a dozen women including Cassandra Searles who said ‘He continually grabbed my ass and invited me to his hotel room’ directly endorses reputed Alabama teen-luster and racist-conpiracy-theory-hurling alleged-Christian Roy Moore — who stands accused of inappropriate sexual contact with several women when they were teenagers and acknowledged that he was first attracted to his eventual wife when he saw her at a dance recital in her early teens — for Senate seat despite former judge’s past refusals to follow federal law and openly bigoted views on gay people and inability to get into an Alabama mall because he was banned for being a creep.”

Sometimes the headline is all you need.

Of course, if that’s too much for those unwilling to peruse the facts that come below the headline, I suppose we can just give Gross America what it needs, short and sweet: “Perv prez promotes mall creeper.”

That pretty much says it all.

#Resist

[Lois]

 
  Look at the restoration of Land in Utah, which was taken unlawfully by the Obama Administration. More to follow along those lines of sensible actions from this Administration.

Lands that were originally taken from the American Indians.  It was these American Indians that requested Obama designate these national monuments LAWFULLY under the Antiquities Act to preserve important historic indian sites. According to the law, only congress can change these designations, so another Trump action will soon be in court.

[joan1984]

Katiebee, next time vote for a winner. 

Your screed that no matter what it is all Trump's fault is asinine, you know better. Democrats foot dragging all year, and insider deals to see a Special Counsel appointed to investigate some nebulous charge of "collusion", as a mask to just go and ruin this President by hook or by crook, is a silent coup.

[Athos_131]

WALL OF DEFLECTING WORD SALAD FROM A RACIST CHILD RAPE ENABLER

joan1984 is so comically ill-informed, he doesn't even understand why Mr. Mueller was appointed.

Perhaps if he'd quit defending racist child rapers and found some credible sources rather than fly-by-night harangues he'd learn what is actually going on.

#Resist

[Katiebee]

Katiebee, next time vote for a winner.  

Your screed that no matter what it is all Trump's fault is asinine, you know better. Democrats foot dragging all year, and insider deals to see a Special Counsel appointed to investigate some nebulous charge of "collusion", as a mask to just go and ruin this President by hook or by crook, is a silent coup.

You are so wrong. They aren’t going after Trump because he’s Trump and a Republican. They are going after him because he is doing things, and has done things that are wrong,. His actions are inimical to the office, nation, and the laws. His actions are so far from acceptable he creates problems. It isn’t policy, it is stupidity.

If Obama had done HALF of what Trump has done, you would have had a stoke from it.

[joan1984]

  Partisan witch hunt, with some RINOs playing along. Were laws broken by the President? We shall see, but what you see in the media is a soft coup, and not all that soft, that began on November 8 or November 9, and persists every day.

[Athos_131]

 Partisan witch hunt, with some RINOs playing along. Were laws broken by the President? We shall see, but what you see in the media is a soft coup, and not all that soft, that began on November 8 or November 9, and persists every day.

Are you accusing Mr. Mueller of being corrupt?  Why not come out and say that.  It's certainly not above you.

The timeline and Trump's list of missteps began before the election.  Once again you are ill-informed.

Do some research.  If you find something that contradicts what is posted and is from verifiable, credible sources feel free to post it.  

Until then your deflecting, racist word salad will continue to be shot down by people here with a better argument.

#Resist

[Athos_131]

Donald Trump's sexual assault allegations: The full list of women who have accused the President

Jessica Leeds, a former traveling salesperson, alleged that Mr Trump grabbed her breasts and tried to put his hand up her skirt while on a first-class flight in the 1980s. Ms Leeds was in her late 30s at the time.

Ivana Trump, Mr Trump’s first wife, once used the word “rape” to describe an encounter with him. The accusation was made in a 1993 book following a divorce settlement between the two. She has since softened her language, saying that she didn’t mean the word in a “literal or criminal sense”.

Jill Harth, a former business partner of Mr Trump’s, said that Mr Trump forcibly kissed her on the lips, groped her breasts, and grabbed her genitals in what she described in a 1997 as an “attempted rape”. The encounter allegedly occurred at Mr Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, in one of his children’s bedroom. She also says that Mr Trump groped her under the table at a dinner with colleagues at the Plaza Hotel.

Kristen Anderson alleged that Mr Trump put his hand up her skirt and touched her genitals over her underwear at the China Club in Manhattan at some point in the early 1990s when she was in her early 20s. Ms Anderson was an aspiring model at the time.

Lisa Boyne accused Mr Trump of insisting that female models walk across a table at a New York restaurant in 1996, and then remarking on their underwear and genitalia. She was 25 at the time.

Cathy Heller says that Mr Trump forcibly kissed her on the lips during a Mother’s Day brunch at mar-a-Lago in 1997.

Temple Taggart, a former Miss Utah, alleged that Mr Trump forcibly kissed her on the mouth on two different occasions. The first incident was the first time that they met.  The incidents occurred at the 1997 Miss USA pageant event, and in Trump Tower.

Mariah Billado, a former Miss Vermont Teen USA, has alleged that says that Mr Trump walked into a dressing room unannounced in 1997. She said that there were several teen beauty queens aged between 15 and 19 in the room naked at the time.

Karena Virginia alleged that Mr Trump grabbed her arm and touched her breast while she was waiting for a car after the US Open.

Bridget Sullivan, a former Miss New Hampshire, alleged that Mr Trump walked into the Miss USA pageant dressing room in 2000 while contestants were naked. She was 19 at the time.

Tasha Dixon, a former Miss Arizona, alleged that Mr Trump entered dressing rooms at the Miss USA pageant in 2001 while contestants were “half-naked”.

Melinda Macgillivray alleged that Mr Trump grabbed her buttock in a pavilion behind the main house of his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2003. They were in the middle of a group of people, she said, and it was during a concert performed by Ray Charles.

Jennifer Murphy said that Mr Trump forcibly kissed her after a job interview in 2005. She was 26 at the time.

Rachel Cooks alleged that Mr Trump kissed her forcibly on the lips outside the elevator in Trump Tower in 2005. She was 22 at the time.

Natasha Stoynoff alleged that Mr Trump pushed her against a wall and forcibly kissed her in a closed-door room in his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2005. Ms Stoynoff, a writer for PEOPLE magazine, was there to interview Mr Trump.

Ninni Laaksonen alleged that Mr Trump grabbed her buttocks while taking photos outside the Ed Sullivan Theater, and before Mr Trump appeared on the Late Show with David Letterman. Ms Laaksonen was 20 at the time, in 2006.

Jessica Drake alleged that Mr Trump forcibly kissed her and two female friends in 2006, when she was 32. When she pushed him away, she said that he asked her: “How much?”

Samantha Holvey, a former Miss North Carolina, alleged that Mr Trump treated women like “meat” and would barge into dressing rooms to inspect women. She said the incidents occurred in 2006, when she was 20.

Summer Zervos alleged that Mr Trump grabbed her by her shoulders and forcibly kissed her, and groped her breasts, while she was a contestant on The Apprentice in 2007. She said the incidents took place at Trump Tower in New York, and at a hotel in Los Angeles.

Cassandra Searles, a former Miss Washington, said that Mr Trump grabbed her buttocks repeatedly in 2013 during the Miss USA pageant in 2013. She said that he also invited her to his hotel room.

#Resist

[Athos_131]

Deutsche Bank receives subpoena from Mueller on Trump accounts: source

#Resist

[Athos_131]

 "  Russia,  Russia , Russia  "

Flynn Said Russian Sanctions Would Be ‘Ripped Up,’ Whistle-Blower Says

#Resist