The myth of a campus free speech crisis

[Lois]

There are entire websites devoted to promoting this myth.  I have concerns bcause it is a myth.  I went to San Francisco State, and we had both left and right leaning professors there, and most were dedicated to finding the truth whatever it might be.

On my campus it was an extreme left group called the Sparticus Youth League that tried to troll the more moderate left-leaning folks on campus.  They even went as far as to throw a pig snout at director of the women's center, who was a feisty black woman.  Needless to say it did not go over well.


The myth of a campus free speech crisis
What a critic of my recent piece on free speech in academia gets wrong.
By Zack Beauchamp

The status of free speech on college campuses is one of the most heated controversies in American public life today — and, in my view, somewhat overblown. In a couple of recent essays, my colleague Matt Yglesias and I surveyed the research on the topic and found little support for the claim that free speech rights are seriously imperiled at American universities.

In my piece, published earlier this month, I examined three data sources that I argued supported the view that incidents of speech by students or professors being suppressed are relatively rare. When they do happen, these incidents often target liberals and leftists, despite the breathless media coverage of conservative speakers being run off campuses. Yglesias looked at polling on student attitudes toward free speech and found little evidence that they were particularly hostile to free expression.

Musa al-Gharbi, the director of communications for an organization called Heterodox Academy, which promotes “viewpoint diversity on college campuses,” takes issue with both of our pieces. In a piece titled “Vox’s Consistent Errors on Free Speech, Explained,” al-Gharbi argues that we misuse data to paint a misleadingly rosy picture of speech on campus.

“Beauchamp and Yglesias’ essays don’t provide meaningful evidence (let alone knock down proof) that there is no free speech crisis at universities,” he writes. Of my essay in particular, he claims that “two studies were mentioned in the piece, [and] neither had their conclusions accurately represented.”

These are big charges — and they are not supported by al-Gharbi’s piece. I’ll let Matt speak for himself, but al-Gharbi’s claim that I misrepresented data in a way that indicates ideological “bias” does not stand up to scrutiny.

A review of my essay and the underlying research — including conversations with the authors of the two studies in question — affirm the thesis of my piece: that incidents of conservative speech being suppressed on campus are rare and do not add up to a national crisis.

What the core issues at stake are

Let’s start by recapping the central thrust of my argument. Here’s what I wrote:

There are well over 4,000 colleges and universities in the United States. And multiple attempts to catalog free speech incidents on campus, from different sources, keep coming up with numbers in the dozens. And of those dozens, a fairly large percentage of the targets are liberals, and a fairly large percentage of the others were conservative speakers who seem to have come to campus with the intent of provoking students.

In my piece, I summarized the findings of three studies (not two, as al-Gharbi claims):

1. An analysis of data from Georgetown University’s Free Speech Project by the project’s director, Sanford Ungar, published on Medium. FSP’s data covers all types of free speech incidents, ranging from professors’ dismissals to university administrators admonishing students over speech. At the time of Ungar’s writing, FSP had cataloged roughly 60 such incidents on college campuses between 2016 and today.

2. Acadia University professor Jeffrey Sachs’s data on professors being fired for political speech, as published in a piece for the left-libertarian Niskanen Center. This shows “45 cases from 2015 to 2017 where a faculty member was fired, resigned, or demoted/denied promotion due to speech deemed by critics as political,” fewer than a third of whom (13 out of 45) were conservative.

3. Data on speaker disinvitations from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) which shows 20 to 42 such disinvitations per year between 2011 and 2017.

All of these data sources seem to tell the same story: There are several dozen incidents of speech being suppressed on college campuses per year, and those incidents hardly target conservatives exclusively (more on that below).

Given that there are 4,583 colleges and universities in the United States (the bulk of which are four-year institutions), dozens of incidents is ... not a lot. When you limit it to just conservative targets, the number becomes even smaller. Now, some might consider a few dozen incidents a year in a country of 4,583 higher education institutions a national crisis; I would consider it perhaps unfortunate, but not a crisis.

Al-Gharbi has concerns with the way I presented the data from the first two sources, which I’ll address in detail in the next sections. But he entirely omits the third — literally writing that my piece “drew from two sources” — and chides me for not citing it. Here’s al-Gharbi:

If he really wanted to get a sense of the prevalence of these incidents, Beauchamp could then turn from FSP to other prominent free speech organizations that do work on campus, such as PEN America, or the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE).

And here’s my original piece:

The pro-free speech Foundation for Individual Rights in Education keeps a database of speaker disinvitations from campuses. It finds only a handful of disinvitations — somewhere between 20 and 42 — in every year between 2011 and 2017. The highest single-year spike, from 21 in 2015 to 42 in 2016, is mostly the work of one provocateur [Milo Yiannopoulos] launching an intentionally inflammatory college tour.

To be sure, FIRE thinks this is cause for alarm. But I see 42 disinvitations in 2016 — and really 31, if you take out Milo — out of the thousands of invitations higher ed institutions extend per year, and I can’t say that rises to the level of a crisis. (Al-Gharbi also mentions a quote from FIRE’s president that the organization receives more than 1,000 requests for assistance from people on campus per year, but the requests are not public, and it’s hard to tell what percentage of those would qualify as genuine threats to free speech.)

The article goes on for much longer.  If you'd like to read all of it go here:

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/31/17718296/campus-free-speech-political-correctness-musa-al-gharbi

[watcher1]

Public universities should welcome speakers from all sides of an issue. Let the students make their own decisions on whether that speaker comes closest to the student's beliefs or they do not. Part of what students experience in a university setting - views they may agree with and views they may not agree with.

[Athos_131]

Public universities should welcome speakers from all sides of an issue. Let the students make their own decisions on whether that speaker comes closest to the student's beliefs or they do not. Part of what students experience in a university setting - views they may agree with and views they may not agree with.

O Rly?

Leaked Chats Show Racism, Anti-Semitism, and Homophobia in ASU Republican Group

Leaders of a conservative student club at Arizona State University used anti-Semitic symbols, made racist and homophobic comments, and appeared to advocate for eugenics, according to a dossier compiled this winter by former club members leaked to Phoenix New Times.

Two of the group's leaders also appeared in photos apparently making light of the white nationalist vehicular murder in Charlottesville, Virginia.

College Republicans United (CRU) is a small offshoot of ASU’s College Republicans chapter. The group formed in early 2018 by students who pushed for views outside traditional conservative beliefs. An umbrella organization for CRU called Republicans United Federation of Arizona oversees chapters at ASU and Northern Arizona University.

Members of CRU are active in the Arizona Republican Party, having supported Kelli Ward in her successful bid to become the state GOP's chairperson and canvassed for former state representative Maria Syms.

The group's founder, ASU senior Richard Thomas, has already come under criticism for social media posts saying transgender people have mental illness and that Muslims should be deported, among other offensive comments.

Those posts were public. He expresses even more explicitly offensive views in private, according to photos and Facebook Messenger screenshots leaked to New Times. In a statement published on its website prior to the publication of this story, CRU confirmed that its members were involved in some of the chats and photos leaked to New Times.

"College Republicans United should be judged on the public work we have done, judge us on our accomplishments and failures," the statement read. "Don’t judge us based on private conversations that were said to former members who had the ill intentions of using blackmail on club members."

The statement included screenshots showing that the former members who compiled the dossier also used anti-Semitic rhetoric.

Thomas appeared in photos, along with a CRU executive board member, featuring white nationalist tropes and an apparent reference to the murder of Heather Heyer during the 2017 Unite the Right Rally in Charlottesville.

In one of these photos, seen on the left at the top of this story, Thomas stands by a white Dodge Challenger, wearing a CRU T-shirt, while carrying a gallon of milk in one hand and a tiki torch in the other. Cody Friedland, a former ASU student and CRU member, can be seen in separate photo carrying a gallon of milk and a tiki torch.

Heyer was killed by a Dodge Challenger driven by James Fields, who was sentenced to life in prison for the murder. Milk has risen in recent years as a white supremacist symbol, based on scientific misconceptions that caucasians are uniquely fit to digest lactose. Tiki torches were carried by Charlottesville protesters who chanted "Jews will not replace us."

In its statement, CRU said the photos were taken during a Halloween party. "Richard and other people were handed the objects, not realizing he was in front of a Dodge Challenger. It should be noted that Cody in the same photo is half Filipino and Jewish," the statement said.

Thomas declined to address the content of his chats, stating in a text message, "You have a political narrative that you're trying to push that a college club at ASU which supports free speech and moderate conservatism is actually far right."

He added, "All this said in private among members of so called trusted friends. There was a different level of decorum."

In a Facebook Messenger chat leaked to New Times, Thomas linked to a YouTube video from a channel called Special Books by Special Kids, in which a special education teacher makes videos with children living with disabilities. The video Thomas posted features a girl living with Rett syndrome.

"Remind me why we can't have a eugenics policy again?" Thomas, who uses an avatar of a snowman wearing a MAGA hat, wrote. " ," the name used by Thomas in the chat, translates from Russian to "President Rick."

In a text message explaining the chat, Thomas said, "We were talking about Iceland's eugenics abortion policy. We used examples of people who would have been aborted in Iceland." (Iceland has a liberal abortion policy, but calling it eugenics is false.)

In another chat, Thomas appears to refer to the rapper Childish Gambino, who is black, as "degenerate monkey filth." Thomas is apparently speaking with Darian Douraghy, one of the former members who wrote the dossier.

During what appears to be a discussion of Israel, Thomas appears to use an anti-Semitic symbol to refer to the Rosenbergs, the American Jews who were executed for espionage in the 1950s.

"((Rosenbergs)) stole our nuclear secrets and gave them to the Soviet Union too," Thomas wrote.

Anti-Semites are known to enclose names or groups of people in multiple parentheses to indicate that they are Jewish, according to the Anti-Defamation League. Thomas used the symbol again while posting a link to a video featuring Alex Jones, the infamous conspiracy theorist.

"Alex Jones on July 25th 2001 predicts 9/11 and the ((globalist)) agenda," Thomas wrote, in an apparent reference to the anti-Semitic conspiracy theory that Jews are secret puppet-masters controlling the world.

Thomas also made homophobic comments in Facebook Messenger chats, according to the leaked screenshots.

"I don't believe homosexuality or this level of degeneracy is biological it's a choice the ancient Spartans were all fucking each other because it was in the culture same thing for feudal Japan a lot of them were bisexual," Thomas wrote.

The dossier also includes a Facebook posting from Republicans United chairman Kevin Decuyper, whose LinkedIn account said he graduated from ASU's finance school in 2017.

Decuyper, whose profile picture featured him and the African-American conservative commentator Candace Owens, posted in an unrelated racist Facebook group. A man named Austin Wilcox responded, "What's with the nigger in your profile picture."

Decuyper responded, "I work in state politics and co-founded a right wing organization that's already called Nazis/alt-right regularly so it helps me a lot to be camoflaged [sic] and low key on my public profile because it helps to have the support of the right wing community who thankfully don't know my more extreme views."

Ducuyper's discussion of Candace Owens led to a revolt by three CRU members who attempted to get him banned, according to CRU's online statement. The executive board declined to ban Decuyper, but notified members that "affiliations with such Facebook groups would result in immediate consequences."

Two of those members are John Gilbert and Darian Douraghy, according to Alex Legg, an ASU student who said he is friends with both. Legg said he was involved with the early stage of planning CRU but got kicked out in December 2017 before the group officially formed.

The screenshots and photos were collected by former members and executive board officers of CRU, including Gilbert and Douraghy, who left the group. The document is drafted as a letter raising concerns about Thomas and CRU's apparent embrace of offensive views.

"We believe that this should not go unnoticed as the people are not only dangerous to ASU students and faculty but also to society as a whole," the dossier states.

CRU's statement included links to additional screenshots from chats in which Gilbert and Douraghy themselves use anti-Semitic rhetoric.

"It’s a shame that we have so-called fellow “Republicans” who are stooping so low to use leftist rags to attack other Republicans, when the same could be done on their own words just as easily," CRU's statement said.

In the screenshots, Douraghy can be seen making jokes about the Holocaust, enclosing names in multiple parentheses, and posting text art of an anti-Semitic cartoon.

In the screenshot of Gilbert's chat, he can be seen saying, "When I get drunk I go in a tiraid [sic] about the lizard people who control the Jews." Gilbert appears to be referencing a conspiracy theory claiming that many world leaders are actually reptilians who can morph into humanoids.

According to New Times' source, the letter was sent to ASU's student government, Associated Students of ASU, in November. ASU student body president Nikki Tran said she had not seen the letter before.

"As a student leader, I would like to personally say that I condemn any acts of discrimination and hatred," Tran said. "We embrace students with all identities and are actively working to ensure that our campus is an inclusive one."

The letter was also sent to other conservative groups on campus, including ASU chapters of the College Republicans and Turning Points USA, Legg said.

It's unclear to New Times whether any ASU faculty members actually received it.

ASU spokesperson Bret Hovell said the Dean of Students Office, which investigates student complaints, did not receive the dossier.

"I can tell you for sure that the people who would do this kind of investigation have not received it," Hovell said.

CRU last week held an event on campus with Tim Gionet, better known as "Baked Alaska," an alt-right figure who attended the Charlottesville rally as a speaker. Gionet came to ASU with Ashton Blaise Whitty, a right-wing YouTube personality, who gave a talk to the group on March 18.

New Times published a story on Gionet's visit on March 20.

That story referenced reporting by the student-run publication State Press of tweets by Thomas appearing to endorse eugenics. "I fully support a eugenics policy that utilizes infanticide on pregnancies deemed likely to produce disabled children," the tweet stated.

CRU's statement claimed the State Press and New Times took Thomas' tweet out of context, adding that he was "quoting" Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, who did in fact use eugenics rhetoric when she was active in the early 20th century. New Times, however, could find no evidence of a Sanger quote matching Thomas' tweet.

I dunno, maybe not allowing hate speech on college campuses is a good thing.

Of course, we do have some people around here who openly embrace racism.

#Resist

[psiberzerker]

Public universities should welcome speakers from all sides of an issue. Let the students make their own decisions on whether that speaker comes closest to the student's beliefs or they do not. Part of what students experience in a university setting - views they may agree with and views they may not agree with.

Also, they're supposed to be learning Critical Thinking.  If they only hear 1 Narrative (Let's say from a Parochial School straight into a Christian Funded school) then they never develop the filter to differentiate their Own point of view between the 2 Extremes.  It's the way the Bipartisan system is supposed to work in Government.  Every single issue, like say Abortion/Guns is in down the Uncanny Valley the Conservatives, and Liberals hurl insults, brickbats, and tear gas across.  Eventually, the separation becomes so great between generations, you get to this Hardline, where it's NOBODY can have one, or Everyone can get them without ANY limits whatsoever.

All or none.  Good or bad, with nothing in between.  So, basically how we don't deal with Guns, and Abortion now.  In the 90s, Operation Rescue assassinated doctors with guns, under the banner "Life is Precious!"